Skip to content

Wikimedia Europe

Visual Portfolio, Posts & Image Gallery for WordPress

JohnDarrochNZ, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Benh LIEU SONG (Flickr), CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center from Greenbelt, MD, USA, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Michael S Adler, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Markus Trienke, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Charles J. Sharp, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Stefan Krause, Germany, FAL, via Wikimedia Commons

disinformation

Thirty-one Wikimedians, eighteen countries, two days: what we did at the 11th Big Fat Brussels Meeting

Every autumn, Wikimedia Europe brings together a group of Wikimedians who care about policy — volunteer advocates, staff, and people from like-minded organisations. Last week we held the eleventh edition of what we have always called, half-jokingly, the Big Fat Brussels Meeting. Thirty-one people from eighteen countries. Two days. Here’s a quick recap. Day one: the state of the EU, and a sentence that stuck The first day was devoted to the current EU policy situation: the EU Kids Act and age verification, AI and copyright reform, the CSAM Regulation, open government data, and what is happening with the Digital Omnibus. Affiliates shared updates from their own countries, which is always useful — EU decision-making is a constant back-and-forth between Brussels and national capitals, and having advocates who can carry consistent narratives and asks in as many places as possible is a structural advantage the Wikimedia movement is actively leaning into. For the first time, advocacy staff from Wikimedia Czech Republic joined the meeting. They asked for and received input from peers to help shape the chapter’s first comprehensive advocacy strategy. A staff member from Wikimedia in Ireland also attended — that team is just beginning to build its policy reflex, and it was great to see them attend. A standout moment came from Signe Krantz of Wikimedia Sweden, who attempted to distil the movement’s core advocacy proposition into a single line — and, by the room’s reaction, largely succeeded: “Most people feel like they have a choice between the government or large corporations controlling their digital world. We have a third way for them.” The framing of community-governed and not-for-profit platforms as an alternative to both state control and commercial capture struck a cord. Day two, morning: how to hack AI? The second day… Read More »Thirty-one Wikimedians, eighteen countries, two days: what we did at the 11th Big Fat Brussels Meeting

Deepfake laws across Europe: what do they look like and what do they mean for Wikipedia

Deepfakes are understood as realistic images, audio and video of real people that are generated or manipulated with AI. They can be used for parody, satire or to express valid social criticism. But they can be harmful in the cases of fraud, economic damages, disinformation and non-consensual intimate imagery. Lawmakers in several EU countries (Belgium, Denmark and Cyprus) are trying to answer with new rights over a person’s likeness and voice, usually placed in copyright or neighbouring-rights law. For the Wikimedia projects, which host and reuse media under free licences and also document public events and debates (including deepfake incidents themselves), the details of these laws matter. So let’s take a closer look! Belgium: a new neighbouring right over image and voice In September 2026 the Belgian Federal Chamber published a bill amending the Code of Economic Law with regard to deepfakes. It would insert a new Article creating a neighbouring right. What it does The exceptions. There is no infringement where the person has consented, or where the deepfake is used for parody, satire or social criticism, provided a fair balance is struck with freedom of expression and the use does not disproportionately harm the person’s honour or reputation. Our first reading: some reassurances, but incomplete. The parody and satire exceptions are welcome, and the court-ordered enforcement model is narrower than a duty to filter. But several points could affect Wikimedia projects: Denmark: copyright as the vehicle The Danish Ministry of Culture’s bill amends the Copyright Act in two ways. A new section protects any person against the making available of realistic digitally generated imitations of their personal characteristics (appearance, voice) without consent. Another new section gives performing artists a similar protection against imitations of their performances. Protection would run for the person’s lifetime… Read More »Deepfake laws across Europe: what do they look like and what do they mean for Wikipedia

Wikipedia & AI Competition: Biases, Mistakes, Omissions

Competition is a good thing. Wikipedia’s free licences explicitly welcome it. We have seen other platforms and encyclopaedias appear in the past, and we will see more in the future. 

The latest batch of competition that wants to harness AI technology to generate better compendiums of knowledge. These projects criticise things like gaps in coverage, reliable or alleged political biases. Let’s have a look at what’s out there and discuss some of the aspects!

Read More »Wikipedia & AI Competition: Biases, Mistakes, Omissions

Why Wikimedia Supports Secondary Publication Rights for Publicly Funded Research

Through its flagship research programme, Horizon Europe, the European Union will spend 95.5 billion euro on science and research until 2027. Yet, the results of this research in many cases will not be accessible to Europeans – academics, regular citizens or even Wikipedians.

In he most extreme cases European taxpayers will have paid for the research institution, for the actual research, but the research institutions and the researchers will still need to pay expensive licenses for academic journals for access. And even then, the public won’t be able to make use of this knowledge.

Read More »Why Wikimedia Supports Secondary Publication Rights for Publicly Funded Research

“AI for Youth, by Youth”: Why Young People Must Shape the Future of AI Governance

  • by

What happens when students are told for years that “Wikipedia does not count as a source” only to then be handed generative AI tools without question? The result is confusion and a missed opportunity to critically shape our digital futures.

Author: Sophia Longwe, Project Manager Policy, Wikimedia Deutschland

At the third UNESCO Global Forum on the Ethics of AI in Bangkok, Sophia Longwe from Wikimedia Deutschland had the opportunity to speak on the panel “AI for Youth, AI by Youth.” Speakers were from Bangladesh, Namibia, Mexico, Japan, the United Kingdom or Germany, and it was clear to everyone that AI is already transforming how we learn, work, and participate in society. And yet, young people are rarely invited to shape how these technologies are governed. Here is her report.

Read More »“AI for Youth, by Youth”: Why Young People Must Shape the Future of AI Governance

European Democracy Shield: we shared our views with the Commission 

Democracy is one of the fundamental values of the EU and today, as never before, it needs to be preserved and nurtured. Wikimedia Europe welcomes the European Commission’s initiative to adopt a European Democracy Shield to uphold the Union’s founding values.

We are convinced that Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects have a great role to play in the everyday efforts to nurture European democracy and to make the digital information ecosystem more resilient. We explained how in our submission to the public consultation launched by the European Commission. 

Read More »European Democracy Shield: we shared our views with the Commission 

Building an Enabling Environment for DEMocratic Debate. THE DEM-Debate project

Wikipedia has a significant impact on our everyday lives. The largest free knowledge platform on the internet, we regularly rely on its accessible, up-to-date information to form our opinions, even on critical events such as elections.
While most of the research has focused on how large, commercial platforms address disinformation, less attention has been given to platforms non-profit, community-led platforms such as Wikipedia.
The DEM-Debate project aims to fill this gap by exploring whether, and how, the fact-checking and moderation practices used by Wikipedia during the 2024 European Parliament election have enhanced the reliability of the information ecosystem. It also seeks to determine if these practices can be transferred to other online contexts, fostering an environment that nurtures a more democratic debate.

Read More »Building an Enabling Environment for DEMocratic Debate. THE DEM-Debate project

Wikimedia Europe Partners for Research into Wikipedia’s Practices on Information on Elections

1.1 million— the number of times the 2024 European Parliament election article on English Wikipedia has been viewed from May to June 2024. With another 37 language versions and additional millions of views globally, this page exemplifies Wikipedia’s role in informing the public about major political events. Yet, Wikipedia’s impact extends far beyond that. As a widely used repository of knowledge, its content is frequently cited by other media outlets, amplifying its reach and embedding its information within broader public discourse. This means that any inaccuracies or disinformation on Wikipedia could have significant consequences on the public discourse, especially when it comes to sensitive issues like elections.

Read More »Wikimedia Europe Partners for Research into Wikipedia’s Practices on Information on Elections

We need a Digital Knowledge Act

A digital knowledge act for europe

In December 2023 the Communia Association, which Wikimedia Europe is a member of, rolled out the idea of a Digital Knowledge Act at the European Union level. A EU regulation that makes the interests of knowledge institutions, such as libraries, universities and schools, a top priority. 

In the past five years we have seen the EU tackling various specific digital issues through legislation – content moderation through the Digital Services Act, market power through the Digital Markets Act, data sharing through the Data Act and the Data Governance Act. All these were necessary steps, we believe, they however treated institutions, such as libraries, archives, universities and schools, almost as an afterthought.  

Read More »We need a Digital Knowledge Act

European Media Freedom Act: some reflections from Wikimedia Europe

The European Media Freedom Act is a proposal for regulation put forward by the EU Commission in September 2022 aiming at safeguarding media freedom and pluralism in Europe. For Wikimedia it is relevant, because, on the one hand, it wants to regulate how online platforms moderate content by media service providers and, on the other, it introduces some general rules of media law, including the protection of journalists.

Read More »European Media Freedom Act: some reflections from Wikimedia Europe